I am growing increasingly disillusioned with
ficly.
For those of you who stumble across this posting and know not of what I speak, the gist of the site is thus:
Write a story containing no more than 1024 characters. Not words. Characters. And yes, spaces and punctuation count. There's a bit more, such as the ability to write prequels and sequels to a story (also limited to 1024 characters), challenges that one can post and enter, and inspiration derived from flickr images (currently not working). But that's the basics. Write an extremely short story.
You can imagine that one might be hard pressed to fit a complete story into such limited space, and in one respect you would be right. But that's the challenge, paring down your work to fit into the allotted space without losing the meaning. In many respects, it's actually a very good tool. It teaches one to write succinctly, something that I (as a scientist, used to technical writing) can appreciate. It also forces you to examine your vocabulary - is there a single word that takes the place of three - for instance.
When I first began writing on the site (known as ficlets.com in its previous incarnation), I really enjoyed writing the short stories, or ficlets as they were called. It helped me to stretch my creative writing muscles, which had atrophied during my long tenure in graduate school and in my post-doc position. Even I could see improvement from my first, uninteresting stories to my latter works.
Then ficlets went away, an unfortunate casualty of AOL's cost-cutting measures. Fortunately Kevin Lawyer, one of the prime architects under AOL, decided that he didn't want to see it die, and thus he spent valuable personal time recreating the site as ficly.
During the dark time when ficlets was no more and ficly was under development, I decided to really stretch my writing muscles. As mentioned in a previous post, I wrote a full-length, badly written, science fiction novel. I wrote a short story and tried to have it published, to no avail. I wrote another short story and decided to try to turn it into a novel. I abandoned that project, wrote
another short story which is currently sitting in a pile somewhere in Hoboken, NJ awaiting the attention of a reader. This doesn't even mention the untold number of half-started stories sitting in a folder on my hard drive.
Then ficly returned. I immediately opened my old account and posted a couple of stories. I resolved to be more active, to comment more, to post more.
I failed in this regard.
I don't want this to sound arrogant or condescending, but returning to ficly now (for me) is like riding the kiddie roller coaster after the steel, twisting, inverted, floorless behemoth. The space seems too restrictive. Not because I
can't write a scene or story under the character limit, you'll see that I
can, but I just don't
want to.
There is another reason, one brought to the forefront recently at the ficly
blog and in other places, such as the
Social Entropy++ forum at Penny Arcade (many of whom have recently begun posting at ficly
en masse). As an aside, I have no problem with the PA forum posters joining the site, as an old fuddy-duddy and one of the earliest adopters of ficlets, I welcome them.
But some of them have a point:
ficly is not harsh enough.
How many times have I stumbled across a story on ficly rife with spelling and punctuation errors, clumsily executed or juvenile in its theme, and yet it is followed by "five out of five" reviews, cries of "truly excellent!"? Too many to count. I can only shake my head and move on.
I sent my latest short story to an old friend of mine from high school, who is much more immersed in science fiction writing than I, for critique. His comments were not scathing, but they were blunt and honest. Not quite "this part sucks", but "this part really needs work - it's not good." I appreciated his honesty.
In fact, the comments I received from him were nowhere near the harshness of comments I receive regularly on my scientific publications. Try the scientific peer review process sometime. There's a reason it's anonymous. The comments are brutal, and I've been reading strangers' opinions of my professional work going on fifteen years now. Someone telling me my scifi story needs work is
nothing.
I've never gotten that kind of feedback on ficly. But more to the point, I don't feel comfortable
providing that kind of feedback on ficly, either. Which might seem strange. I've torn up graduate students' proposals and manuscripts with so many marks that they felt as if they were physically beaten, but if I tried that on ficly...well...
...for one thing, there's a lot of young writers on the site. And as John Scalzi said about teenage writing (and this includes my own experience) - "
Right now, your writing sucks." That's part of it. I'm not quite prepared to rip apart the works of young people (should it be that bad). So I do something worse, I read it and move along without saying anything.
Another part of it is I don't really
know people who post on the site. When I hand a paper back to a grad student in my lab, I have a good idea on how they will react. I know which ones will grimace, but nod and take it in stride. I also know which ones need a little hand-holding and reassurance. I have no idea how
writer34732 on ficly will respond to a truly honest criticism.
So I don't comment much on ficly. And I don't post new stories there much. Which means I am not really involved in the site any longer.
Ficly, have I outgrown you? I don't know. Maybe. I've opened the site many times recently and poked around disinterestedly, but I have not interacted much at all.
I can see myself visiting there irregularly, perhaps dropping a short story now and again to get creative juices flowing, but I don't think it will ever be consuming for me like ficlets once was.
This isn't a rant. This isn't a complaint about the fine site that Kevin has created or the people there who contribute regularly, or those that just really, really enjoy the short format.
In this particular case, it's really not you, it's me.